Spacer Search | Contact Us
USP News Release
USP Home


Academics | Undergraduate Admission | Graduate Studies | Life @ USP | Research | Athletics | Alumni & Friends | About USP | Contact Us | FAQ | News and Events | Visiting and Directions | Give to USP


For Immediate Release

Contact: John M. Martino
Phone Number:  (215) 895-1186
Date: 06/02/01

DRUG INFORMATION ON THE WEB CAN BE HELPFUL AND HARMFUL

More and more consumers and health professionals are utilizing the Internet to seek information on prescription drugs. According to Mignon Adams, director of library and information services at University of the Sciences in Philadelphia, the challenge is not finding accurate information, but finding complete information that is unbiased. "In this country, pharmaceutics is one of the largest industries," says Adams, "and to keep financially healthy, companies need to push their products, sometimes through direct advertisement to consumers."

Adams says there are several "prescribing information" sites that are helpful and easy to navigate, including Druginfonet (www.druginfonet.com/drug.htm), the Federal Drug Administration site (www.fda.gov/), and Scholz Healthcare (www.ditonline.com/monograph/index.html), a site where you can search for either the generic or brand name of a drug and be linked directly to the site of the drug manufacturer. There are other sites that provide information that is not written by manufacturers, and therefore are considered to be less biased and are often much more clearly written. Some of these sites include Rxlist (www.rxlist.com), Drug Facts and Comparison (www.drugfacts.com), and the People's Pharmacy (www.healthcentral.com/peoplespharmacy/peoplespharmacy.cfm).

Websites about herbals medicines, minerals, and vitamins are huge areas of concern, according to Adams.

"Websites that promote natural products are generally inaccurate, filled with anecdotal claims and personal testimony," says Adams. "The worst websites you can find revolve around natural products, because their claims are so outrageous. They take advantage of people's illnesses. Consumers suffering from diseases and other ailments who could be treated effectively in traditional ways are persuaded by these websites to use supplements that have not been proven to work. They only give people false hope."

So how can consumers distinguish whether a website is good or bad? Adams says one way is to locate sites that have The Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct (HONcode). The HONcode symbol alerts consumers that a health website has chosen to abide by basic ethical standards in the presentation of information. Adams adds that some websites that do not have the HONcode are also good, but consumers always have to be cautious of any information that is not supported by.references to the clinical literature.

"Consumers have to ask themselves who is distributing the information and why," says Adams. "They need to know a web site's bias, whether it's a non-profit organization, like the American Heart Association, or a large pharmaceutical company, like Merck. Consumers should always go to health websites whose claims are backed up with references to evidence."

 To arrange an interview, contact John M. Martino at (215) 895-1186.

###

 


 

 
USP Logo