Summary of the Faculty Learning Community
Project Director: Phyllis Blumberg
Co-collaborators: Catherine Bentzley, Leslie Ann Bowman, Barbara
Hogan, Pamalyn Kearney, Peter Miller, Michelle Mulhall, Andrew Petersen,
Glenn Rosenthal, Shanaz Tejani-Butt, Susan Wainwright

Abstract: Ten USP faculty members and the Director of the Teaching
and Learning Center established a faculty learning community on
learning-centered teaching. As departmental champions, these individuals
implement learning-centered teaching in their own courses and support
and educate other faculty in adopting student-centered learning
approaches. This community developed and disseminated concrete,
practical guidelines for implementation. The work of this learning
community will advance a culture of learning-centered teaching at
USP.
Since the identification of the strategic imperative to create
a culture of student-centered learning and living, faculty have
discussed this idea in a variety of venues. Themes of theses discussions
have always been the confusion as to which is student-centered learning
and whether we can do it here at USP given our current structure
within the educational programs. Our faculty seem to accept the
idea of students taking more responsibility for their own learning
but are uncertain and in some cases unwilling to implement it in
their own courses, especially given the emphasis of scientific content
and large size of some of our sections. Our faculty are not unique
in this reluctance to adapt learning-centered teaching (Weimer,
2002).
The student-centered learning and living tactical planning group
identified the need for “expansion of faculty, staff, and
administrator support and education of student-centered learning
and living.” This proposed project addresses both the support
and education of faculty as they implement student-centered learning.
One of their proposed mechanisms for this support and education
is to develop a group of faculty champions across the university
who will be knowledgeable about student-centered learning and who
will help others to implement learning-centered teaching.
While the director of the Teaching and Learning Center has been
talking about student-centered learning for quite a while, she has
been asking for faculty volunteers who want to be actively engaged
in learning more about this topic. Ten faculty members, representing
most of the departments at the university, have volunteered to be
part of this learning community.
As the phrase is used in higher education literature, faculty
learning communities usually are multi-disciplinary groups of 8-10
faculty who are engaged in collaborative learning on a topic to
improve student learning. These communities meet frequently to promote
learning, development, and a sense of community. Learning community
participants on other campuses are expected to engage in a project
such as revising courses (Cox, 2002). The work of the members of
the USP faculty learning community on learning centered teaching
will be to implement learning centered teaching in their own courses,
to develop mechanisms to help others to do so, and to advance the
culture of learner-centered teaching at USP.
The ultimate goal of this project is to educate and support the
USP faculty at large in implementing learning-centered teaching.
Specific objectives include:
1. To create a functional faculty learning community to develop
a full understanding of learning-centered teaching.
2. For each participating faculty member to implement learning-centered
teaching in at least one of their courses during the 2003-2004 school
year.
3. To provide the knowledge and ability for these faculty to be
learning-centered champions for all of the faculty.
4. To develop and disseminate concrete guidelines for implementation
of learning-centered teaching at USP.
Some examples of learning-centered teaching within USP courses
are:
1. Catherine Bentzley is in the process of changing her first-year
chemistry courses to be more learning-centered.
2. Leslie Bowman changed how she teaches information searching in
her teaching within other courses, especially PP448.
3. Barbara Hogan applied more learning centered principles into
her service learning components in Death and Dying and Social Gerentology.
4. Pam Kearney revised her Rehab course to use Michaelson’s
Team-based learning approach.
5. Peter Miller expanded his use of concept mapping to more of his
teaching and is involved in scholarship of teaching research on
its use.
6. Michelle Mulhall is in the process of revising the policies for
clinical education for the PT program to make them more learning-centered.
7. Glenn Rosenthal used a simulation of a virtual company in his
capstone course for Pharmaceutical Marketing and Management.
8. Shanaz Tejani-Butt expanded the use of concept mapping in her
teaching and presented maps developed by her students at USP’s
2003 Scholarship Day.
References:
Cox, MD. Proven Faculty Development Tools that Foster the Scholarship
of Teaching in Faculty Learning Communities. In Wehlburg, CM., and
Chadwick-Blossey, S. (Eds.) To Improve the Academy. Bolton, MA:
Anker Publishing Co, Inc. 2002.
Weimer, M. Learner-Centered Teaching. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass,
Spring, 2002
Last updated on:February 24, 2005
|